Awards and Coronets
pug at arlut.utexas.edu
Mon Mar 27 13:14:11 PST 1995
>> This is true if you consider humility to be a "knightly" state of being.
> Humility and desire for recognition may be two different things. I
I conceed this point. I didn't think it out well enough.
> believe it is possible to desire a title and still be modest.
> Really now, how many knights fight Crown tournament out of
> purely altruistic desires? I think many of them probably fight
> because they want to be "King".
To be honest, I think the desire to be King is outside of the other
> They want the *title*, the prestige,
> the rank and power that goes along with it.
I think that the desire to be King should be the goal of every fighter
in this Kingdom. (Since that is how King is decided.) I can understand
that not all of them will want the recognition, but this is the ability
to be the best fighter in the Kingdom, not to be the best Knight.
> By your strict definition,
> fighting in Crown tournament to become a "King" is unbecoming of
> a peer.
I honestly view Kingship outside of the peerage realms. This loan title
has nothing to do with the attributes of becoming peers. (Very little to
do with Knights as I understand who can become King.)
> I am splitting a very fine hair, here, I realize. I guess I must say
> that I would like to agree with you on your ideals of peerdom, but
> the realist in me is forcing me to debate. Perhaps it is because I
> know that *I* do not fit your ideals, and I'm just trying to justify
> my own feelings.
To be quite honest, I am arguing my ideals here. Since I have no plans
of becoming a Knight, I have honestly don't know how my ideals would
change. As well, since I have not started moving up any of the ladders,
I don't know how long my ideals will hold out.
> It maybe relevant to note that I'm *not* a peer,
> nor likely to become one anytime soon. :-)
Hell, I have no awards, so I guess I have a long way to go and to hopefully
prove my ideals. *grin*
> It think it should be for the opposite, IMHO.
This sounds good to me since I truly want to a seperation of "knightly"
attributes from good figthing.
> Yes, the pomp and circumstance around peerage s plenty of shouting.
Good. I was afraid someone would need more. That is beyond
> My point is that people desire exactly *that*. If you do the work of a
> Pelican (whatever that is!), is it wrong to desire that bit of pomp and
> circumstance as a reward? If only just a little bit? That's all
> I'm saying.
I think that if that is your driving goal behind wanting to be a
Pelican, then you truly need to reevaluate your goals in the Society as
well as life.
I think that is my difference between want and desire. Desire has more
force behind it in my viewpoint.
> Thanks for a good discussion. It's really forced me to examine my own
> motivation and ideals.
Certainly. I hope that we haven't bored everyone else with this topic.
It's certainly helped me as well to try and voice/rethink what I view
the peerage *should* be in the Society. Hopefully if I decide to walk
one of those tracks I keep all of this in mind.
Phelim Uhtred Gervase | "I want to be called COTTONTIPS. There is something
Barony of Bryn Gwlad | graceful about that lady. A young woman bursting with
House Flaming Dog | vigor. She blinked at the sudden light. She writes
pug at arlut.utexas.edu | beautiful poems. When ever shall we meet again?"
More information about the Ansteorra