ansteorra V1 #43

[cmwalden at bga.com]

>From: litch at eden.com (R. Michael Litchfield)
>Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 16:09:51 -0500
>Subject: Re[2]: Stepps Warlord

>That's nice, I'm glad you are not a scum sucking reactionary worm
>[...]

*Sigh*

>The annocement I read certainly seemed to indicate that they were going to
>give a benefit to people who fit thier paradigm of a family and I find that
>paradigm to be overly restrictive and supportive of a mentality I despise. 
If they
>didn't mean to sound like a bunch of dittohead clowns then they should have
>used different words.

What's the appropriate alternative?  I know that this is an area sensitive 
and I don't know the best way to handle it.  What would be a more 
compasionate way to provide financial relief for larger family groups, but 
not offend people of different points of view?

Antonio