ansteorra V1 #43

[R. Michael Litchfield]

>>The annocement I read certainly seemed to indicate that they were going to
>>give a benefit to people who fit thier paradigm of a family and I find that
>>paradigm to be overly restrictive and supportive of a mentality I despise.
>If they
>>didn't mean to sound like a bunch of dittohead clowns then they should have
>>used different words.
>
>What's the appropriate alternative?  I know that this is an area sensitive
>and I don't know the best way to handle it.  What would be a more
>compasionate way to provide financial relief for larger family groups, but
>not offend people of different points of view?

Well I rather like the way Cynric put it "no matter how many kids you have
it won't cost over 30$". Eight more words but it utterly avoids a lot of
the really negative connotation of "nuclear family".

>Antonio

-michael