GoR: who has 'em in the RoP & why

[lorraine]

>To be clearer on my question, here's two different entries from the Roll 
>of Precedence, showing only their Grant level awards.
>
>Anne Louise of Bluecastle - Barony 07/31/82 the Steppes
>                            GoR    01/07/84
>
>Bjorn Magnusson Esping - Barony 10/20/79 Baron Namron
>                         CSM    11/18/79
>                         CIM    10/09/82
>                         GoR    10/20/79
>
>The first one shows someone receiving a Grant two years after becoming a 
>landed baroness. The second one shows someone receiving a barony and a 
>grant on the same date. I could list *many* more examples of both of 
>these two circumstances.
>
>So why? Is it a case of "ohmighod, the scroll didn't *say* grant, so we 
>better award them a GoR"? Or, is it a case of poor research? Or is it a 
>case of the belief that *both* the barony *and* the grant had to be 
>recorded in the roll of precedence?
>
>Estrill

I went home, checked the newest and previous OPs.  It looks like the GoRs
were given by some crowns kind of as a service award sometimes and sometimes
along with landed baronies.  I imagine that Aohdan will know for sure.

Lorraine