Principalities
Rik Packham/Angus mac Taggart
aquinas at eden.com
Mon Sep 16 08:21:57 PDT 1996
I like the idea of breaking off OK and the panhandle into a principality,
_IF_ the kingdom has to break up into principalities. Two principalities
should be enough. As far as who should keep the name of Ansteorra, I
believe that Texas should hold on to the name. That is selfish point of
view, but I also see that the Lone Star State should hold onto the One Star
Kingdom's name.
My $0.02.
Angus
>
> As I understand it, one of the points is that it's too far to drive from
> one end to the other, thus making it a burden on the Crown. If that *is*
> one of the points, I think they should reread the part of Kingdom Law
that
> says they should be willing to accept the financial and time requirements
> when entering crown tourney. *wink*
>
> IMO, we'd be just as well off by giving OK and the panhandle away. I have
> a strange feeling it's going to get real ugly politically having 3
different
> Principalities. (Order of Precendence; Kingdom vs. Principality Awards;
just
> why did we create regional officers; who gets the name Ansteorra - first
> barony, first event, center of kingdom, etc; ...)
>
More information about the Ansteorra
mailing list