cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message

Admin-GTESUPH1 admin-gtesuph1_at_gtesuphub1 at
Fri Jul 18 15:55:52 PDT 1997

Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
	Please retry later.
Original text follows:

-------------- next part --------------
Received: from by (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.00.02)
	; Fri, 18 Jul 97 16:05:39 -0600
Return-Path: <root at>
Received: from [] by
  (SMTPD32-3.03) id AC57CDA0124; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:12:55 -0500
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA30350
	for ansteorra-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:21:30 -0500
Received: from ( [])
	by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA30347
	for <ansteorra at>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:21:28 -0500
Received: (from mail at localhost)
	by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA08863
	for <ansteorra at>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:21:28 -0500
Received: from by via smap (V2.0)
	id xma008855; Fri, 18 Jul 97 15:21:01 -0500
Received: (from pug at localhost)
	by (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA26337
	for ansteorra at; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:21:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgate22 ( [])
	by (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA30100
	for <Ansteorra at>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:10:22 -0500
Received: by mailgate22 (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA25900; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:10:17 -0700
Received: from by mailfep2-hme1 via smap (KC5.24)
	id Q_10.1.1.6/Q_11324_1_33cfcbb4; Fri Jul 18 13:01:56 1997
Message-ID: <33CFCBF2.7043 at>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:02:58 -0500
From: "William H. Herron III" <wherron at>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
Subject: SCA Purchases
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
Resent-From: <agulick at>
Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 97 16:13:03 EST
Resent-To:  agulick at ccnet

I'm glad that we're all having a nice discussion on the purchase of
alcohol with SCA funds.  It brings up another issue that I've hit in the
past, and I'll throw it out to see what reactions you all come up with.

The Barony of Namron (and most other groups, I'm sure) has a first-aid
kit that is maintained by the chiurgeon.  We always brought it with us
to events, demos, etc. when we had a reasonable assumption that it would
get used.

As a treasurer, I always had the chiurgeon refill the box after its use,
and reimbursed the chiurgeon off of their receipts.  No problem.

So, my question is, if the chiurgeon decided to keep some form of birth
control in the box (and for my example, I'll say condoms), and this was
a part of supplies used during a weekend, should the SCA be responsible
for reimbursing that expense?

I don't want to talk about the legal side of this.  It's a valid
expenditure, and if I had ever been presented with receipts I would have
reimbursed without question.  I want to know the opinions that people
have on the, er, "correctness" of the expense.

Try not to let personal feelings or beliefs interfere (any more than
they normally would, anyway).  Should we pay for such items?

When the issue came up in Namron, we discussed it and agreed that the
Barony should not be subsidizing, er, such things.  But I think it could
have gone either way.


More information about the Ansteorra mailing list