cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message
postmaster_at_okstate at okway.okstate.edu
Sat Jul 19 06:35:47 PDT 1997
Message is undeliverable.
Reason: User "dssweet at okway.okstate.edu" is not found in the cc:Mail Directory.
Original text follows:
-------------- next part --------------
Received: from bastion.globeset.com by okway.okstate.edu (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.00)
; Sat, 19 Jul 97 07:35:12 -0600
Return-Path: <ansteorra-owner at bastion.globeset.com>
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
by bastion.globeset.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA08887
for ansteorra-outgoing; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 07:29:37 -0500
Received: from exchange3.health.state.ok.us ([220.127.116.11])
by bastion.globeset.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA08884
for <ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG>; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 07:29:35 -0500
Received: by exchange3.health.state.ok.us with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
id <01BC9415.944F2490 at exchange3.health.state.ok.us>; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 07:30:06 -0500
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Oklahoma_State_D%l=EXCHANGE1-970719123038Z-1312 at exchange3.health.state.ok.us>
From: "Decker, Terry D." <TerryD at Health.State.OK.US>
To: "'ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG'" <ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG>
Subject: RE: SCA Purchases
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 07:30:38 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63
Sender: owner-ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
Reply-To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
>>As a practical note, the OK State Health Dept. gives condoms away for
>>Family Planning and stopping STDs. We take a tremendous amount of abuse
>>from the moralists who believe AIDS is a judgement upon the immoral and
>>sinful. The SCA does not need this. We get enough flack.
> I guess my concern at this would be which seems worse to you, flack from
> small group of moralists, or the health or life of a friend?
Replace "small group of moralists" with "middling bunch of fanatics". They
are working overtime at the legislature to kill funding for the condom
programs, family planning, and anything else to which they object. I doubt
the SCA could stand up to being the object of their "affections(?)".
And we haven't touched on the idiots that want to make the flack real
(there is big hole down on 5th Street from one of those).
Personally, I would love to see condoms readily available and sex education
in the schools, but do I have the right to force my world view on people
who are adamantly opposed to it? Until I can talk them into seeing the
world my way, I'll opt for individual responsibility and action. And,
although I don't need them any more, I think I'll pick up a dozen for the
next condom jar I come across.
More information about the Ansteorra