ANST - Re: ADMIN: Condoms...
amazing at mail.utexas.edu
Wed Jul 23 15:19:49 PDT 1997
Gnith responds to Pug's
>> Enough is enough folks.
>With two sentences, I've managed to shut down a behemoth debate that's
>grown to 100+ posts and covered everything from AIDS to liberals v.
>conservatives to teen pregnancy to chainmail condoms.
>See, Sir Lyonel, I wasn't being terse -- just concise. ;)
>My work is done here,
Tant pis, mes amis. I was enjoying this debate, and we managed to share a
good deal of useful information.
I disagree with Pug on this one, and I'm not trying to start a debate on
the list administrator's authority, but tell me, Pug, are you "officially"
censoring this discussion or merely stating a preference?
By the way, Pug's definitions of "obligation" and "requirement" approximate
colloquial usage, but current colloquial use doesn't address the full
breadth of those definitions. The word "obligate" comes--if memory
serves--from the Latin root "obligo": I bind. Requirements are binding,
obligations are binding. The words can be and frequently are used
lo vostre por vos servir
Sir Lyonel Oliver Grace
To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
SCA-Cooks-Request at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of unsubscribe.
More information about the Ansteorra