ANST - Face Protection
jtc at io.com
Thu Jul 31 12:09:17 PDT 1997
> > Safer? I don't think so. Consider that the goggles:
> > - Don't breath well (i.e. sweat you can't wipe out of your eyes)
> > - Don't protect the rest of your face
> > - Don't work with the 3/4 inch blunts, where those are used.
> > - Cost a lot more than expanded. I don't know about perf.
> > In short, they are better than nothing, but not better than
> > perf/expanded. I speak as someone who owns a couple pair. I wear them
> > as a marshal, but I would be very unhappy if I had to wear them under
> > my helm.
> are you speaking of generic safety goggles or sports-guards that are
> specifically designed for active sports?
I was speaking of raquetball glasses as that is what I own, but ALL
of my above points apply to both.
> where you eye's are concerned, the final point that you made should
> not even be considered ... cost of protecting your vision should be
> your very *last* consideration.
Well, if you look at the list above, I think you will find it WAS my
last consideration. OTOH, when you are trying to get a few thousand
fighters to add something to their armor so you can play archery,
cost matters a great deal.
For example, if we came up with a WONDERFUL solution that only cost
$500 per fighter (force fields? :->) no one would care that it was
wonderful, just that it cost $500. If you came up with a GOOD
solution that cost less than $1 each, they might be willing to do it.
Remember, if it costs too much they can always just say, "no
archery". That would be free.
To be removed from the Ansteorra mailing list, please send a message to
Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe ansteorra".
More information about the Ansteorra