cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message

[Admin-GTESUPH1]

Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
	Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------

-------------- next part --------------
Received: from imail.gtes.com by ccnet.gtes.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.00.02)
	; Fri, 18 Jul 97 16:43:02 -0600
Return-Path: <root at imail.gtes.com>
Received: from [207.239.133.66] by imail.gtes.com
  (SMTPD32-3.03) id A52012E600F6; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:50:24 -0500
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by bastion.globeset.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA31179
	for ansteorra-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:14:36 -0500
Received: from spsem02.sps.mot.com (spsem02.sps.mot.com [192.70.231.5])
	by bastion.globeset.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA31176
	for <ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:14:32 -0500
Received: from mogate.sps.mot.com by spsem02.sps.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Email 2.1 10/25/93)
	id AA22352 for ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG; Fri, 18 Jul 97 14:14:29 MST
Received: from risc.risc.sps.mot.com (risc.sps.mot.com) by mogate.sps.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Email-2.0)
	id AA13393 for ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG; Fri, 18 Jul 97 14:13:32 MST
Received: from riscgate.sps.mot.com (riscgate.sps.mot.com [222.244.249.34])
	by risc.risc.sps.mot.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id QAA05221
	for <ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:13:30 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <n1342879819.57580 at riscgate.sps.mot.com>
Date: 18 Jul 1997 16:12:40 -0500
From: "Mark Harris" <mark_harris at quickmail.sps.mot.com>
Subject: Re: SCA Purchases
To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.1
Sender: owner-ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
Resent-From: <agulick at imail.gtes.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 97 16:50:26 EST
Resent-To:  agulick at ccnet

Fitzbubba asked:

>So, my question is, if the chiurgeon decided to keep some form of birth
>control in the box (and for my example, I'll say condoms), and this was
>a part of supplies used during a weekend, should the SCA be responsible
>for reimbursing that expense?

Within reason, I don't have a problem with this. But just as with band-aids
or first-aid cream, if the same person were to come ask for this item at
more than an occasional event, I would encourage them to buy their own
supply. I would rather my friends be safe but each individual has to  
ultimately be responsible for themself.

And anyone taking advantage of the hospitality of the group must be 
caring of the hospitality. Using the groups adhesive bandages to hold gear 
together or using condoms provided by the group as balloons are both 
reprehensible wastes of others money and hospitality.

Stefan li Rous
markh at risc.sps.mot.com