ANST - Re: SR - Why a Principality?

[Kaitlyn McKenna]

>
>In a message dated 98-04-08 08:06:53 EDT, you write:
>
><< ...However, Sir Conor Mac Cinneade's objection to the inclusion of 
Stargate
> (for various personal reasons) is noted. ...
> 
> 
> Lord Johann,
> 
> Could you elaborate further upon this statement?
> 
> Fergus Stout
> 
> >>
>
>
>Well, I'll do what I can.
>
>Sir Conor explained to me that there are those in Stargate who have, 
from time
>to time, formed a stranglehold on the Throne, to the detriment of the 
rest of
>the Kingdom.  Now, I personally have never experienced this phenomenom, 
having
>been in the Society for only my fifth year, going on six, so I cannot 
say
>wether this is true or false; However, Sir Conor, having been around 
much
>longer than I, may have had this experience, so, until proven 
otherwise, I
>shall take his word at face value, and note his objection.
>
>Of course, things may happen that are well beyond my control.  I can 
only
>watch and wait for things to occur.
>
>Lord Johann Kiefer Hayden (Paul E. Kiefer, Jr.)


Greetings from Mistress Kaitlyn McKenna,

I do not normally post here, but...please, please, please, do not lump
an entire barony together with the actions long outdated of a particular 
household that lives in Stargate.  We certainly do not.

thank you,
kaitlyn

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.