ANST - sites and misuse of hospitality ...

[Stephanie Edwards]

I'm not convinced another NFP with another bod would be any better.  This
still boils down to a small group of people making rules everyone must be
able to abide by.  This still leaves the questions I listed about how rules
are established and what to do if an SCA group does not follow the rules. 
Also, do the bod members have to be SCA members?  If not, would they one
day decide they don't want the SCA there anymore?

> On 29 Apr 98, Stephanie Edwards wrote:
> 
> > There is also the fact that this kingdom or
> > whoever would then become landlords themselves.  Who gets to set the
> > rules?  THere are drastically different ideas about what makes a
> > good site and what site rules are reasonable as well as questions of
> > how to deal with an SCA group that does not play by these rules.
> 
> This is not so tough as it sounds. You see, if a separate NFP was 
> formed the SCA would not really own the land. The other NFP 
> organization would have it's own BoD, bylaws (very simple, I hope) 
> and charter. They would control the land according to those rules.
> 
> Christian Dore
>
============================================================================

> Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.