[Fwd: ANST - To Become Principalities Or Not]

[Alice Harris]

In response to Karen Evans'--
>>  This kind of objection comes from someone
>> with no experience with Principalities.

Alina says:

>Your comment and insult of my opinion was totally uncalled for. 
>As nonsmoker nor a drug addict, I know both elements are bad and  I wouldn't
>want to do either. 
>Just because I have never been part of a principalities, doesn't mean my
>opinion are any less significant than yours.  

Sorry, Alina, but as a former smoker, recovering alcoholic, and prior
citizen of a principality, I have to say I find your analogy itself far
more insulting than Ms. Evans' dismissal of uninformed opinions.   Are you
saying principalities are invasive, addictive, mind- and body-altering
chemicals?  No, of course not, but you *are* saying--whether you meant to
or not--that principalities are "bad."  

Greeting From Alina:
I guess I left myself open for that. What I was trying to say and/or type was,
just because I don't have experience with something doesn't mean my opinion is
to be less valued.

Alina Mitchell 
lg_photo at texas.net
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Dennis and/or Dory Grace <amazing at mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: ANST - To Become Principalities Or Not
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 22:11:11 -0500
Size: 3822
URL: <http://lists.ansteorra.org/pipermail/ansteorra-ansteorra.org/attachments/19980412/1569dddd/attachment-0001.eml>