ANST - Gulf War Archery...Clarified Rules....! (...or a misc

James Crouchet jtc at io.com
Thu Jan 29 08:14:01 PST 1998


On 28 Jan 98, Tim McDaniel wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Joe Wolf <WolfJ at bisys.com> wrote:
> > Sir Kief wrote:
> > >
> > >1.  NO HIT ARCHERS: These folks will be marked by WHITE
> > >DIAMONDS...! Don't hit them under any circumstances.
> > 
> > Kief... will these archers be subject to fire from enemy
> > archers??
> 
> "I'm not Kief, but ..."
> 
> No, they are not subject to fire.  If you're not using
> Baldar Wire-Guided Heat-Seeking Blunts (software release 3.2
> or later -- that's when they finally debugged the white
> diamond recognition artificial intelligence) you can't shoot
> anywhere near them.  Even if there's one white diamond
> archer in front of a clump of 20.  At least the new war
> rules require them to warn you of their presence, with the
> mandated "nyah nyah, I'm rubber, you're glue!" cry.
> 

Your pardon, but I believe this is incorrect. Archers have always 
been able to shoot archers and I do not believe that changes here. 
Yes, the white diamond makes it a bit more confusing as you must not 
shoot a marshal (which is part of why I don't like the White Diamond 
for archers) but not being able to shoot the archers would make them 
(us) incredibly powerful. We are already by far the deadliest folks 
on the field. However, I will try to get us an official ruling if 
anyone will return my calls.

Dore
============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.



More information about the Ansteorra mailing list