ANST - Documentation (wordy)

[barbara at mail.argontech.net]

Mistress Aquelain wrote:

>Right now I believe the general expectation for standard 
>documentation is one page with all the "what it is, how it was done 
>then, how I did it, where I deviated from period, and why" info, one 
>page to list the references, plus a photocopy or two (preferably in 
>color) of similar period exemplars. Most of us don't have the time 
>or necessarily the inclination to read a thesis or look at 47 8x10 
>color glossy photograph (especially the ones with the paragraphs on 
>the back explaining what each one is ;-> ). That kind of work should 
>be entered as a research paper, and the item should be entered with 
>a one-page summary covering the above "what it is, etc," info with a 
>note to see the research paper if the judge is so inclined. 

Okay, but that is what I did, and a Laurel helped me with it, and I 
still got only 5 out of 10 points on documentation.  So what are we 
supposed to think?  

Alys.
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.