ANST - "It's Not Period"

[ches at io.com]

And so this leads me to my thought on this new peerage that they are
hashing out rather badly on the other list, sigh.

I fear that Another "fighting" peerage means that members of that circle
may also fight for crown in the other kingdoms with tournaments that
adhere to that martial art.

I am not against this since SOME historical heads were not
fighting warriors of the sword thus could be argued as period.

I am not comfortable with this and want to make sure it is not going to
happen this way.

Any educated thoughts on this out there???

Sincerely,
F. Havas
ches at io.com

On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Burke McCrory wrote:

> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 12:08:22 -0500
> From: Burke McCrory <bmccrory at oktax.state.ok.us>
> Reply-To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
> To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG
> Subject: Re: ANST - "It's Not Period"
> 
> At 11:44 AM 10/21/99 -0500, you wrote:
> 
> > > When the Knights sit in there circle they look at the men and women around
> > > them with the knowlege that any one has the potential to be the next
> >Crown,
> > > and one most likely will.  Doesn't this make them a little different.
> > >
> > > Cassandra Palfrey
> >
> >Who says that only a Knight can win Crown?
> >
> >Trinity
> 
> I don't believe that was what Cassandra intended.  She said "and most 
> likely will"  I don't think that is an absolute, it leaves open the 
> possibility that a winner of crown will not be a member of the chivalry.
> 
> Sir Burke
> Burke McCrory
> Internet Administrator
> Oklahoma Tax Commission
> bmccrory at oktax.state.ok.us
> (405)-522-5808
> ============================================================================
> Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
> 

============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.