ANST - FW: Musing on August 4 -- Father of Democracy

[j'lynn yeates]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


- -----Original Message-----
From: Ellsworth Weaver [mailto:astroweaver at yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2000 12:56
To: 2thpix at surfari.net
Subject: Musing on August 4 -- Father of Democracy


Dear Folk,

On this date August 4, 1265 one of the true fathers of democracy or
at
least representational government, a man whose marble portrait hangs
in
the US Congress, died a horrible and pitiless death. His name was
Simon
de Montfort and the battle was Evesham.

When King John of England died, he left his son Henry III (born 1216)
as his heir. Henry was still a child and was under the regency
(protection) of William Marshal. As Henry III grew up, he showed that
he had inherited most of his father’s bad traits and very few of his
good ones. As king, starting in 1227, Hank III tried and failed to
regain his grandmother’s land of Aquitaine from France. He continued
to
launch unsuccessful campaigns across the ditch in France. Now, most
folks will put up with wars if their side is winning. What is the
definition of insanity, again? Doing the same thing over and over and
expecting different results? Right!

Since his father, John, had turned England over to the Vatican as a
papal state, Hank III filled English church appointments with
Italians.
His court advisors were French. What do you think his now thoroughly
English barons thought of this? Okay, they might have been a bit more
charitable than that, but you have the idea. There was a baronial
revolt (1233-1234) to express their mild displeasure at Hank.
Although
Hank tried to be more British in his outlook, he kept slipping and
eating brie with his wife’s (Eleanor of Provence -- married her in
1236) relatives.

Simon de Montfort secretly married Henry’s sister, Eleanor, which
somehow seemed that de Montfort was climbing even higher than his
Earldom. Now an Earl is not a paltry thing and Simon was a model of
true chivalry. Still Henry caught lots of flak from the barons about
that. Henry III to show his trust in Simon, sent him to Gascony in
1248
to reestablish some semblance of British order to the place. The
robbers and thugs were actually the landed "gentry" who complained on
trumped up charges that Simon was being mean and ugly and disloyal to
the king. Henry screwed up. He recalled Simon in 1252 which put de
Montfort in a bad light. Honor with Simon was not a trifling thing.
Wait for that to come back in a moment.

Henry got a pretty nice offer from the Pope to make Henry’s younger
son, Edmund, King of Sicily. There was a small catch: Hank had to put
up money to finance a small war to kick out the Hohenstaufens
(remember
Barbarosa?) from the place. Hank said, "Sure, I’ll write you this
check." The barons found this another reason to be angry. They were
not
too happy with hanging out with the Pope. After all, King John had
already given England to the papacy once. They were also not happy
about spending more money for some foreign wars. And you know what?
They really hated that they were not asked about any of this. The
barons told Hank, "You want the money, you raise it yourself."

Now the Pope was hacked at Hank for trying to renege on the deal
(popes
need money, too, dear hearts) and threatened to excommunicate him, so
Hank had to come to terms with the barons. Guess who was now leading
the barons? Yep, Simon de Montfort. To get the cash the king had to
accept the Provisions of Oxford (1258) and the Provisions of
Westminster (1259) which essentially said that the king had to
consult
with his barons before going in debt for foreign wars. Two years
later,
the king repudiated these provisions saying he was forced at sword
point to sign them. Kings cannot limit themselves like that.

The next year, 1263, saw an armed insurrection, The Baron’s War,
against the faithless king. Although there was an attempt for a
peaceable settlement with arbitration of Louis IX of France, the
power
of absolute monarchy was reasserted. How surprising! Ask a king if a
king should be forced to listen to barons; what would that king say?
So
the war resumed. In 1264 Simon and his forced won the battle of Lewes
where he captured Henry III.

In 1265 Simon summoned a representative Parliament. It was the first
of
its kind. Here we had not just barons, but knights and even wealthy
shopkeepers meeting together to discuss the way things should be run.

This rabble rule could not stand long. Prince Edward, later Edward I,
led the royal troops toward the river Severn near Worcestershire.
Most
of the rebel troops were hungry and tired. The march had been a long
one and Simon had forbidden looting. Edward surprised Simon as his
troops were finally chowing down in Evesham. The battle which
followed
was called a "decisive victory." It was a slaughter. Edward lost only
one knight and two squires. On the other side Simon, his son Henry,
Sirs Hugh Despenser, Peter de Montfort, William de Mandeville,
Radulph
Basset, Roger St. John, Walter de Despigny, Willima of York, and
Robert
Tregos – all powerful knights and barons – were killed. The captured
list went on and on. Simon’s head, hands and feet were cut off by
order
of Edward and displayed throughout England.

In the summer of 1266, the remnants of the baronial forces, under the
leadership of Henry de Hastings, used Simon’s castle as a refuge. The
ensuing siege of Kenilworth Castle is the longest in English history,
and demonstrated the strength of the fortifications against siege
machines like the ballista brought in from London. Barges were even
brought from Chester in an attempt to enter the castle across the
meer.
In July 1266, the Archbishop of Canterbury stood before the castle
walls and excommunicated the beleaguered followers of de Montfort.
Unimpressed by this early example of psyops, the defenders dressed
one
of their number in clerics' garb and promptly excommunicated the King
and Archbishop! Seems only fair.

After about a 6 month siege, the barons were overcome by disease and
famine and finally surrendered. From that time on Prince Edward ruled
England with his father as only a figurehead. Henry died in 1273.

There is much more to tell you about Simon de Montfort but this story
is already long. Perhaps another time. Funny thing, though, when
Edward
I became king, he started listening more to his barons and even to
townspeople. Hmmm. Maybe he learned from his dad’s mistakes.

What have we learned from this? Don’t let your mouth write checks
your
butt can’t cash? Eleven is perhaps too young to be king? Edward was
an
awful and gory person? Kings do not take well to being limited? How
about: the road to freedom is a long and bloody one?

As always, forward these to friends and others you wish to bug but
leave my name and sig attached.

Admiring Simon de Montfort quite a bit,
J.  Ellsworth Weaver

SCA – Sir Balthazar of Endor
AS – Polyphemus Theognis
TRV – Sebastian Yeats


=====
SmileWeavers Astrology Charts & Interpretations
Modern & Medieval (but always discreet)
If you are interested, contact me at
astroweaver at yahoo.com or 805.473.8867

Read back issues of Musings at
http://www.thereadersvine.com/~Jennifer_deTocqueville/sebastiansmusing
s.html

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3
Comment: public key for jyeates at realtime.net at certserver.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBOYtgkc50zdvN3Vp0EQL1zgCgopa7t7rK3XiUo8Jrg14EJq4W4Q8An2HV
8jvd1uf9ZX1qvlGKB5xcLgq0
=tKyI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.