ANST - membership

Mark.S Harris rsve60 at email.sps.mot.com
Fri Feb 11 17:37:20 PST 2000


CRICKETRED at aol.com wrote: 
> In a message dated 2/11/00 8:39:33 AM Central Standard Time, baw2 at lucent.com
> writes: 
> <<
>  I feel that any paid member over the age of 18 should be counted.
>   >>
>    I don't agree with that.  I think any membership should be counted,
> regardless of age.  I know that I first joined the SCA when I was 14 (17
> years ago), and I did it on my own.  my parents, though they signed their
> consent, were not interested in playing themselves.  I also know of many more
> teens who joined the SCA " of their own accord"... is their money less green?
>  Also, what would be the point of the SCA OFFERING "family" or "associate"
> memberships...if those memberships don't "count"????
>      Letha de Loc Airgead

But since family memberships can be from one person on up to three, four,
or more what number would you use in the population counts?

If the teen is registering on their own, then that would be a regular, sustaining
membership and should be counted, IMHO.

Stefan li Rous
stefan at texas.net
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.



More information about the Ansteorra mailing list