[Ansteorra] Bad things

Laetitia laetitia at doverkeep.com
Mon May 14 20:32:51 PDT 2007

At 08:23 PM 5/14/2007, you wrote:
>Ideally, there should only be one person who has consented to take care of
>children's activities, then any number of parents taking their hour shift as
>required by the Kingdom's Childrens Guidelines.
>Lord Engenulf de Vienville

If anyone working with children must have a background check does 
that mean any parent helping must have had a background check?


> >From: vujadea200 at aol.com
> >Reply-To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc."
> ><ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
> >To: ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> >Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Bad things
> >Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:17:54 -0400
> >
> >Ian,
> >    The only (potential) problem I see would only allowing those who have
> >passed the "SCA approved" backgroud work with the children.  While I think
> >this is an ideal situation, I know (from experiance) that sometimes, just
> >finding two adults to work with children is hard enough, but now, having to
> >find others that meet the requirements, might be more difficult.
> >     Would previous background checks work (i.e scouts, or work, or
> >military)?  It seems that this would open MANY more people that could do
> >the work (and the society wouldnt have to foot the bill).
> >
> >Adena Terricsdotter
> >
>Ansteorra mailing list
>Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org

More information about the Ansteorra mailing list