[Ansteorra] Fw: [Burkhaven] bad stuff here in the east

Mike Wyvill wyvillmike at hotmail.com
Sun May 13 19:02:37 PDT 2007


And trhey would be better people because they succumbed to the temptation? 
At what point does someone become responsible for their own actions?

Sorry, the predator is the bad guy here, but the children didn't walk to his 
house. They were dropped off.


>From: "Randy Nicholson" <rnicholson2 at gvtc.com>
>Reply-To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." 
><ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
>To: "'Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.'" <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
>Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Fw: [Burkhaven] bad stuff here in the east
>Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:25:20 -0500
>
>Why have so many of you taken this point of view regarding the parents?
>You're not in their shoes and you don't know if these parents did or did 
>not
>check this guy out, or to what extent they may have checked him out.
>Perhaps he passed muster for them.  And we don't know for a fact that these
>people are suing the SCA just to get rich as some of you have indicated.
>Perhaps they are suing the organization to force changes in policies that
>have needed it for a very long time.  Lawsuits have a way of taking on a
>life of their own.  Not to paint too broad a brush for attorneys, but it's
>their jobs to find deep pockets.  Perhaps the parents went to the attorneys
>to force these changes and dollar signs popped up on their eyeballs like
>those cartoon characters.
>
>I say we stop hammering the parents for now until we know for a fact what
>their motives are.  If there is someone out there that knows these facts
>first hand, then let them come forward and correct me - or prove my point.
>Either way is fine by me.
>
>Robert de Bray
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org
>[mailto:ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf Of Stefan li Rous
>Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 2:14 PM
>To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
>Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Fw: [Burkhaven] bad stuff here in the east
>
>
>On May 13, 2007, at 1:42 PM, HLDarcy wrote:
>
> > Oh, yes,
> >
> > And then the parents can sue the SCA for retaliating against them.
> > How many
> > lawsuits do you want the SCA to face?
> >
> > Darcy
>
>The SCA might be forced to allow them to stay members officially.
>However, nothing in that says that the members of the Society need
>pay heed to this. SCA Inc. is one thing. The Society is another.
>
>Right now the parents are hiding behind the shield laws. When their
>identities are known, the power of the Internet should make most
>aware of who they are both in society and in the Society. So as
>someone else mentioned, I doubt they would stay members even if they
>currently are.
>
>Stefan
>--------
>THLord Stefan li Rous    Barony of Bryn Gwlad    Kingdom of Ansteorra
>     Mark S. Harris           Austin, Texas
>StefanliRous at austin.rr.com
>**** See Stefan's Florilegium files at:  http://www.florilegium.org ****
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ansteorra mailing list
>Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ansteorra mailing list
>Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org





More information about the Ansteorra mailing list