[Ansteorra] Bad things

[Judie Willey]

NO...if this is a person you personally trust to baby sit...that is
different. We are talking the persons directly involved  in children's and
Youth Activities
Hadassah



On 5/15/07, Chelsea Durham <baby_sis_83 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> So you're saying if my husband has to work late, and I have to take my
> child
> to fighter practice with me to be baby sat by one of the fighter's ladies
> (she's already volunteered), I have to have someone there that's passed a
> background check? Perhaps we should make all of the officers have a
> background check. They have to be there (marshal if it's fighter practice
> at
> least) and they can serve the two functions. I don't think it's a bad
> idea,
> especially since if a child's in trouble, they'll likely seek out someone
> like an officer for help.
>
> Known in these Current Middle Ages as Lady Grainne Kathleen NicPadraig
> MacDaniel
> None is deceived but he who trusts too much.
>
>
> I believe it was an officer or person whose official function in the SCA
> requires them to work with children.
>
> They cannot require anyone but officers to get background checks. However,
> they can require that any official SCA function (and that includes fighter
> practices and *may* include guild meetings) where children are present
> have
> at least one person who has been checked and practice two deep adult
> rules.
> This would be simllar to requiring a Marshal at any official SCA
> activities
> that include fighting.
>
> Caelin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org
> [mailto:ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf Of Laetitia
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 23:20 PM
> To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
> Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Bad things
>
> At 08:46 PM 5/14/2007, Mike Wyvill wrote:
> >Don't know how you can possibly enforce anything like that especially
> >if they are not members as a majority of the people who play seem to
> >be. But the person in charge should have passed it.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong but did not the original announcement mention
> *anyone* working with children? Wouldn't that include any parent
> volunteers?
>
> Laetitia
>
>
> > >
> > >If anyone working with children must have a background check does
> > >that mean any parent helping must have had a background check?
> > >
> > >Laetitia
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ansteorra mailing list
> >Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> >http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Like the way Microsoft Office Outlook works? You'll love Windows Live
> Hotmail.
>
> http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_outlook_0507
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>
>


-- 
Rebbe Hadassah Sarai bas Yossi
MoC Barony of Steppes

Dragon's Laire Ceramics
www.dlceramics.com
"dragon's breath to fire our kilns"