[Ansteorra] Bad things

Richard Threlkeld rjt at softwareinnovation.com
Mon May 14 21:31:59 PDT 2007


I believe it was an officer or person whose official function in the SCA
requires them to work with children. 

They cannot require anyone but officers to get background checks. However,
they can require that any official SCA function (and that includes fighter
practices and *may* include guild meetings) where children are present have
at least one person who has been checked and practice two deep adult rules.
This would be simllar to requiring a Marshal at any official SCA activities
that include fighting.

Caelin 

-----Original Message-----
From: ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org
[mailto:ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf Of Laetitia
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 23:20 PM
To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Bad things

At 08:46 PM 5/14/2007, Mike Wyvill wrote:
>Don't know how you can possibly enforce anything like that especially 
>if they are not members as a majority of the people who play seem to 
>be. But the person in charge should have passed it.

Correct me if I am wrong but did not the original announcement mention
*anyone* working with children? Wouldn't that include any parent volunteers?

Laetitia


> >
> >If anyone working with children must have a background check does 
> >that mean any parent helping must have had a background check?
> >
> >Laetitia
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ansteorra mailing list
>Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org


_______________________________________________
Ansteorra mailing list
Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org




More information about the Ansteorra mailing list