[Ansteorra] Transparency. was CLOSED MEETINGS

Richard Threlkeld rjt at softwareinnovation.com
Mon Jan 14 10:18:22 PST 2008

That might be because they did not disclose what they would be discussing. A
general statement might calm the waters.


-----Original Message-----
From: ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org
[mailto:ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf Of Sir Morgan
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:11 AM
To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Transparency. was CLOSED MEETINGS

So you CAN think of reasons why the doors should legitimately be closed.... 
Are you then saying you are choosing to believe this isn't one of those 
times?  I'm at a loss here...  Everyone seems to be saying they can see 
there are reasons for closed door meetings, and nobody knows for certain 
that "this" isn't one of those times.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Yeager" <chuymonstre at yahoo.com>
To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Transparency. was CLOSED MEETINGS

> I have heard from several officers (Baronial and Kingdom) lately talk 
> about not holding some discussions publicly because "things will get out 
> of hand".  Will some people go off on weird tangents or possibly bog 
> things down with what the officers feel are irrelevant?  Possibly.  Hell, 
> Likely.  That can still be handled diplomatically and things can be kept 
> functioning.  Is it more of a pain for the people holding the discussions 
> or making the decisions?  Absolutely, at least initially.  But it may save

> other problems in the long run.  Other than the reasons previously stated,

> I can think of no reason that ANY discussions are held behind closed 
> doors.  Even if most of us have no choice but to accept the decision made 
> by others in those discussions.
> Cuan

Ansteorra mailing list
Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org

More information about the Ansteorra mailing list