[Ansteorra] Request for Comment-LegalCounsel proposal

Lisa May maaggie1 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 24 07:42:37 PDT 2008


Top that off with a better ability to control legal representation costs,
and you have the picture!

Maggie

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Dave Wise <wiselaw at comcast.net> wrote:

> Another issue is simply coordination of the representation.  Since the
> Society has it's own legal entity it wants to have a single legal position
> on any given issue.  This is more difficult to accomplish with different
> counsel providing representation, i.e. making sure the left hand talks to
> the right.
>
> Alexis
>
>
> Lord Amra:
> I believe the intent of this provision is to discourage unnecessary expense
> in hiring individual counsel when the SCA may already have a letter of
> engagement with a firm that they perfer to use in matters involving the
> organization.  However, if a member of the Board feels they would be
> unfairly represented by counsel of the SCA's choosing, then they by all
> means should be permitted to retain their own counsel, but perhaps consider
> that it might be at their own expense.  Many organizations and corporations
> have similar requirements.  If my interpretation of this proposed language
> is accurate, then I believe it should be adopted.
> Respectfully,
> Lady Elizabeth Seale
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>



More information about the Ansteorra mailing list