[Ansteorra] Proposed change in waterbearing
engtrktwo at gmail.com
Tue Jun 17 12:05:50 PDT 2008
Indeed, I certainty welcome conversation on the topic, and never meant to
imply that it should not be talked about.
We just need to remember who is not listening to this conversation, and how
much they want to know what we are thinking.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Rose & Chad <love at roseandchad.net> wrote:
> "But whatever strong feelings we may have on the issue, please, I too ask
> everyone to remember that questions and comments have a proper point of
> contact for this issue, and that contact should be used.
> email: comments at sca.org
> otherwise, we are just talking to ourselves, and not making any difference
> at all.
> Lord Ivo Blackhawk"
> I agree that anyone with an opinion should express that opinion to the
> correct people... But I would like to see what other people have to say
> about it before I make my opinion known. :)
> For instance, I worried about how it would affect other food-activites,
> such as feast or any type of competition, but now how it would affect how
> such activities are funded. That just hadn't occurred to me. My opinion has
> now expanded by listening to other people's feedback. It's also possible
> that someone might raise very good points that cause me to change my opinion
> If I had sent off a comment right away, it would have been very limited in
> scope. So I would either not send another e-mail, or send many, possibly
> contradictory, e-mails, neither of which seem as helpful as one concise
> Just my five cents. (Inflation, you know. :D)
> Rose the Obnoxious
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
More information about the Ansteorra