[Ansteorra] Corporate Structure (was Non-Member Surcharge)

[Eule]

And all I was doing was offering yet another option.  I'm sorry you did
not perceive it that way.

I did not state nor imply "like it or leave it", but offered yet another
truly viable option and a quite valuable one at that.

Had I intended to state "like it or leave it" I would have said that vs.
starting the sentence with the suggestion of "Another option".

Truth is, there are quite a number of solutions to this perceived
problem all of which can be valuable in a brainstorming and open minded
environment such as this.  I'm sorry that you feel my input is not
valuable.

Eule/Steve
Unus sed Leo
 


-----Original Message-----
From: ansteorra-bounces+eule=ecpi.com at lists.ansteorra.org
[mailto:ansteorra-bounces+eule=ecpi.com at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick R
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:57 PM
To: Inc.Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA
Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Corporate Structure (was Non-Member Surcharge)


Ok that was a bit over the top. all the person was doing was asking a
question and a response bettet than if you don't like it leave could
have been a little more helpful
 
Dante 

--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Eule <eule at ecpi.com> wrote:


From: Eule <eule at ecpi.com>
Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Corporate Structure (was Non-Member Surcharge)
To: "'Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.'" <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 4:51 PM


Another option, of course, is to start your own group and run it the way
you'd like.  There are quite a lot of folks who are members of the SCA
who have done just that.

Eule/Steve
Unus sed Leo