[Ansteorra] Why aren't we doing this?

troop0341 at aol.com troop0341 at aol.com
Fri Nov 5 19:04:06 PDT 2010

Don Tivar, your memory is correct - The Known World Handboke of AS XIV does seem to indicate in no less than five different articles that 1650 was the accepted date. It also has a interesting little diddy concerning an frantic autocrat... <grin>
 With Respects,  Iain MacKay

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Zakes <dontivar at gmail.com>
To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc. <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Fri, Nov 5, 2010 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Why aren't we doing this?

At 01:25 PM 11/5/2010, you wrote: 
>Unto Don Tivar, HL Daniel, and others who called me on this, I offer >apology. I misspoke. 
>Yes, I found a link to the 'original Articles of Incorporation' >dated 6/69 after I posted. As the earliest documetation I can >currently lay my hands on, I concede the point and withdraw my >statement with regret. It is not the document to which my admittedly >age-affected memory was referring, but I haven't found what I WAS >looking for and don't know at this point how LEGALLY applicable it >was anyway. Until I find it, I am silent on this, and likely to be afterwards. 
Fair enough. It's possible that the source of your confusion was first edition of the Known World Handbook. I've been told that it used the 1650 date, but my copy of that edition has either gone walkabout or is buried in one of the boxes down in the garage, so I can't check easily. (But since it was published in the early 1980s, it would still post-date the original Articles of Incorporation.) 
  -Tivar Moondragon 
Ansteorra mailing list 
Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org 
In order to make changes and manage your account please go to: 

More information about the Ansteorra mailing list