[Ansteorra] Questions I would like answered

Casey Weed seoseaweed at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 22:34:55 PDT 2011


I'll take "Context" for 1000, Alec.

Your Grace, you need to take a little time letting us all know how you got
here in the first place.  Perhaps a list of relevant facts or quotes that
set your keyboard in motion?  Most of us have no clue what you're talking
about.

Sir Dieterich

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:51 PM, willowdewisp at juno.com <willowdewisp at juno.com
> wrote:

> I want to know some answered to some questions. Just like you I am not
> privy to the meetings held at red tape nor to the list so this is the only
> way I have to find out things.
> I do not have enough informant to have an opinion so if someone out there
> would be willing to inform me of the truth or the party line I would be
> gratefulThat would allow me to counsel people and like a peer is suppose to
> do.
> Duchess Willow
> 1. It seems to me that this region split is the product of many years of
> weeding groups to produce this clear cut thing. My husband, Duke Jonathan
> noticed that if you draw a line through the groups you could predict the
> next ones being put on suspension. The final thing in the way was the West.
> Was the West suspended  to make way for a three way split of Ansteorra?
> 2.Some people have stated that there has been a plan to get rid of shires.
> the Individuals have state that kingdom officers had stated that Shires were
> a drain on the kingdom. . I know that many kingdoms don't have shires. What
> is the official position on Shire? Would a small group stand a better chance
> to become if they started out as a Canton?
> 3. Some people in the North believe that the kingdom is taking Bonwick away
> because we in the north of Ansteorra were trying get a name? With Bonwick we
> in the North were big enough to think about being separate. Is there any
> truth to this?
> 4. When the proposal was presented to the people to form three
> prinicalpalies the people rejected it. One of the reasons that was given
> that we had enough events in our local groups and we were happy. After that
> the Crowns started cutting down on local events. Reasons given to me where
> 1, to encourage people to put bids in for kingdom events and 2 to encourage
> the creation of "regional" events. These reason were never given to me by
> the same reign.
> Many of the Autocrats and creative people thought having a principality
> would make more 'business" events and take away from their fun. The policy
> of limiting local events has destroyed the chances of creative autocrats to
> do fun things and many of those people have left the SCA to go do things
> where they can do interesting things. Since they are gone their opinon no
> longer counts
> Was all of this done to clear the way for the principalities split?
>  I would like to know if any of these concerns have any value. Individuals
> have asked me these question and I have not been able to get answers..
> ____________________________________________________________
> Penny Stock Jumping 3000%
> Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4e3c744690d8e42da1fst03vuc
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> In order to make changes and manage your account please go to:
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>



More information about the Ansteorra mailing list