[Ansteorra] sorry for off topic but is someone needs a inexpensive ride

[Svan Coldbrowskaldsson]

answered privately
 > From: willowdewisp at juno.com
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 22:51:48 +0000
> To: ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> Subject: [Ansteorra] Questions I would like answered
> 
> I want to know some answered to some questions. Just like you I am not privy to the meetings held at red tape nor to the list so this is the only way I have to find out things. 
> I do not have enough informant to have an opinion so if someone out there would be willing to inform me of the truth or the party line I would be gratefulThat would allow me to counsel people and like a peer is suppose to do. 
> Duchess Willow
> 1. It seems to me that this region split is the product of many years of weeding groups to produce this clear cut thing. My husband, Duke Jonathan noticed that if you draw a line through the groups you could predict the next ones being put on suspension. The final thing in the way was the West. Was the West suspended  to make way for a three way split of Ansteorra? 
> 2.Some people have stated that there has been a plan to get rid of shires. the Individuals have state that kingdom officers had stated that Shires were a drain on the kingdom. . I know that many kingdoms don't have shires. What is the official position on Shire? Would a small group stand a better chance to become if they started out as a Canton? 
> 3. Some people in the North believe that the kingdom is taking Bonwick away because we in the north of Ansteorra were trying get a name? With Bonwick we in the North were big enough to think about being separate. Is there any truth to this?
> 4. When the proposal was presented to the people to form three prinicalpalies the people rejected it. One of the reasons that was given that we had enough events in our local groups and we were happy. After that the Crowns started cutting down on local events. Reasons given to me where 1, to encourage people to put bids in for kingdom events and 2 to encourage the creation of "regional" events. These reason were never given to me by the same reign. 
> Many of the Autocrats and creative people thought having a principality would make more 'business" events and take away from their fun. The policy of limiting local events has destroyed the chances of creative autocrats to do fun things and many of those people have left the SCA to go do things where they can do interesting things. Since they are gone their opinon no longer counts
> Was all of this done to clear the way for the principalities split?
>  I would like to know if any of these concerns have any value. Individuals have asked me these question and I have not been able to get answers.. 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Penny Stock Jumping 3000%
> Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4e3c744690d8e42da1fst03vuc
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> In order to make changes and manage your account please go to:
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org