[Ansteorra] Underage Participation In The SCA

James Crouchet james at crouchet.com
Tue Feb 7 08:36:32 PST 2012


So then the question is whether we are only considering amounts that have
already been awarded or potential liability. Given that we were discussing
the future I assumed the latter.

Christian Doré
 On Feb 7, 2012 9:27 AM, "Jay Rudin" <rudin at peoplepc.com> wrote:

>
> >> It is now apparent that having people underage participation in the SCA
> >accounts for over 90% of all of our liabilities in the SCA.
>
> >Where did you get this number?  Considering the huge liability potential
> of
> >feasts, I suspect that is our number one liability issue.  I'm sure there
> >are a couple of others before we even get to combat. You think child abuse
> >cases are expensive? Consider the price tag for wrongful death.
>
> The crucial number is $1,300,000. Unless we've paid out more than $130,000
> for all other lawsuits, that 90% is a reasonable belief.
>
> Incorrect, but reasonable. That's the problem with rare-event statistics.
> A single high-level case in 45 years is just not enough data to base
> anything on.
>
> But until we start getting sued over feasts, there's even less data to
> call that a major liability issue.
>
> Robin of Gilwell / Jay Rudin
>
> ________________________________________
> PeoplePC Online
> A better way to Internet
> http://www.peoplepc.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> In order to make changes and manage your account please go to:
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org
>



More information about the Ansteorra mailing list