[Ansteorra] Food Vendors, menus & Ingredients

[Tim McDaniel]

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, James Crouchet <james at crouchet.com> wrote:
> Danihel, I agree that what I said makes no sense if I was addressing
> the line you quoted. But I wasn't.  I was addressing this line:
>
> > but rather than encumber food merchants with having to deal with
> > such thing for a realitively few of us,
>
> True, I did not specify that but, as you pointed out, my comments
> make no sense if applied to the cross contamination issue.  I
> suppose I just assumed that most people would apply what I said to
> the part where it does make sense.  I now see the error in that.
> <sigh>

I have seen many cases in net discussions of people ignoring other
people's points and making senseless replies.  I think it not
unwarranted to assume that, if several points have been ignored, that
those points were accidentally overlooked or being deliberately
unaddressed, and so I think it reasonable to address them nonetheless.

I suggest, when someone is replying to a message with several points,
that they trim the quoted text to just the points that they're
replying to, or summarize just what they are responding to.

Danyell Lincoln
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com