ARCH - Archery Ranking System

[Bob Dewart]

Isn't this codifiying and labeling  ourselves?

Gilli

-----Original Message-----
From: John Moore <iaen-mor at worldnet.att.net>
To: ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org <ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org>
Date: Thursday, July 13, 2000 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: ARCH - Archery Ranking System


>The title forester was included because it is one of the positions that an
>archer was or could be expected to fill for his/her lord/lady.  In some
>areas of europe it also was a position that was hereditary, passing from
>father to son and so on.  Again these are just recommendations open for
>discussion by the archer community and not final. Ranger I personally would
>have a problem with, it sounds like something out of a D&D game.  I could
be
>wrong though.  Iaen
>----- Original Message -----
>From: ADM CHUCK SWANSON <kc5lts at swbell.net>
>To: <ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org>
>Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 9:12 PM
>Subject: Re: ARCH - Archery Ranking System
>
>
>> I like the ranking System But the term Forester/Ranger My Early period
>> Persona is that of a forester
>> Lord Charles De Marquette
>> Cadet to Don Eule
>>
>>
>===========================================================================
=
>> Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list
tasks.
>>
>
>===========================================================================
=
>Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
>

============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.