ARCH - Marshal Who??

[Bob Dewart]

You took that part somewhat out of context.  Pug was stating being able to
do a thing that required an authorized marshal  and was wondering why he
couldn't do that which requires a warrented marshal, ie Marshal incharge of
a target archery range.

As it currently stands there is not an authorizing system for archery
marshals because there is no authorization system for target archery.
Therefore you are correct.  We can; however, have authorized Combat Archery
Marshals.  Two *totally* differant kettle of worms as we are seeing.

Come to think of it you're right, a fighter could become an archery marshal
at large.  However; to gain the experience and what not to become an archery
marshal at large requires a lot more  time and energy than most folks want
to put in on it.  Just like I could become an MOC, but I don't think so.

Gilli

-----Original Message-----
From: Rayburn, Timothy <TRayburn at healthaxis.com>
To: 'ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org' <ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org>
Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: ARCH - Marshal Who??


>Um.... by my understanding of current marshallate rules and practices, this
>paragraph is wrong.
>
>My understanding is as follows :
>
>All "At-Large" marshalls are deputies of the Deputy Kingdom Earl Marshall
>for Archery.  Their names do appear on the warrant list that is presented
to
>the crown, and membership is indeed required.  The distinction drawn below
>concerning Warranted and Authorized does not exist when speaking of
>Marshalls for an archery range.
>
>A local heavy fighter that wanted to fight in crown could serve as either
an
>At-Large or as a Local Archery Marshall and have been in a warranted
>position (just as I am warranted as a Pursuivant in the college of arms).
>[As a side note, the /requirement/ for a /warranted/ position to have been
>held is at the least an over-stated generalization.  Those who choose to
>disagree should first read V.5.4.2 and the body of V.5.4]
>
>Timothy of Glastonbury
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bob Dewart [SMTP:gilli at seacove.net]
>> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 10:37 PM
>> To: ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org
>> Subject: Re: ARCH - Marshal Who??
>>
>> Now comes into veiw the difference between a warrented marshal and an
>> authorized marshal.  On the list field a authorized marshal is what is
>> required by the rules, and that's not taking a bit away from the
abilities
>> of those good gentles that give so freely of their time.  Membership is
>> not
>> required to be an authorized marshal.  However, a warrented marshal is
>> required to be incharge of an archery range.  Warrented means several
>> things;  1) the warrented marshal's name appears on a list signed by the
>> Soveregin, the Earl Marshal and the Kingdom Archery Marshal.  2).
>> Membership is required to be a warrented archery marshal.  Perhaps if
>> target
>> archery had an authorizing system....Nope.   I'm not going there, at
least
>> not now.  Been there, done that, spent way too much money on it.
>> Hummmm...money... now there's a thought.  If I weren't a warrented
marshal
>> I
>> would have to be a member..hummmmmm.  :)


============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.