ARCH - Marshal Who??

[Bob Dewart]

But having  two at large and a local is really redundant.

I don't plan on moving and I don't think Talon does either.  We'd probally
have 3 at large marshals but Roger's job doesn't let him play much.

But really, why is a local marshal required if even *one* achery marshal at
large lives in a group.  When life can go on without a herald, or a Minister
of Arts and Science, or Hospitaler, or a MOC,  (take your pick of non
required to be a shire officer list) what's the big deal????

Gilli


-----Original Message-----
From: Mirrim and Suvdchin <mirrim at moritu.net>
To: ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org <ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org>
Date: Monday, June 19, 2000 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: ARCH - Marshal Who??


What redundancy?  You don't have a local archery marshal.  Having two
at large marshals in the same small group with no local marshal sounds
like redundancy to me.

Mirrim

> I guess because they have two archery marshals at large and just don't see
> the need for the redundantcy.
>
> Gilli


"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit
there."
Will Rogers
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.


============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.