ARCH - Our Greatest Test
Dewart, Charles R. --G3 Contractor (Anteon Corp)
Charles.Dewart at hood.army.mil
Mon Apr 23 09:17:31 PDT 2001
Well, if that's what would happen if the Kingdom Treasurer gets involved,
then that won't happen.
You're also assuming one of our Kingdom regs would get changed to allow that
to happen. The one that require vanes which means at least two. Now of
course, if the Siloflex passes, rip that cock vane off and replace it with
But, you're right, if the Siloflex passes, then the cost of refits will drop
a whole bunch. And if it does, that's a good thing, then we use the money
to help with the Participants Handbook.
Unless, we come up with something better to do with in a non party sort of
From: Eadric Anstapa [mailto:eadric at scabrewer.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:02 AM
To: ansteorra-archery at ansteorra.org
Subject: RE: ARCH - Our Greatest Test
"Dewart, Charles R. --G3 Contractor (Anteon Corp)"
> I've had a few more thoughts on this.
> Since the BoD is going to wait till the October meeting to review the
> decision, there are now some possibilities that weren't there before. So
> the exact outcome is unclear at this time.
> In this post I want to talk about the auction thing.
OK, I am not aopposed to an auction thing or other fund raiser to help the
kingdom out However, I think you are going to find that when you starting
getting the SCA treasurers involved and talk about giving money to
*individuals* to help them offset the cost of new equipment or retrofits
things are gunna get shot down.
Now, if thje Siloflex/Tube APDs that are currently being discussed get
approved and work out then they are actually cheaper than the fletches they
would replace. Does that mean that the archery community should donate the
savings back to the kingdom? :-P
Lord Eadric Anstapa
Coastal Regional Archery Marshal, Ansteorra
eadric at scabrewer.com
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Ansteorra-archery