[Ansteorra-archery] Newest Attack on CA?

John iaenmor at swbell.net
Tue Dec 16 21:13:47 PST 2008


Sir Kenneth, not to worry I knew what you were talking about.  I was 
surprised at how CA friendly Sir Lyonel was from what little I had heard 
about him.  You can blame his squire for that.  I also was very 
impressed on some of his ideas.  I think most of the Ansteorran archers 
realize how many of our knights support us.  Of course there are always 
some who will not or just plain hate us but they seem to be in the 
minority. 

The way that list exploded I don't think any of us had to fully read and 
absorb all of the conversations going on.  I know I got to the point 
were it was a quick skim over things and unless something really caught 
my attention it was hit the delete button time.  I did spend one night 
reading them all and it took almost 3 hours to get thru all of it.  Talk 
about being in the land of confusion.

Honestly aside from one more CA friendly knight I don't think it would 
do much good for you to get on the list.  It does seem to be winding 
done somewhat and has gotten to the point were it is not really worth 
the time.  Unless of course you have the time and feel like getting 
really bored. 

Iaen

Ken Theriot wrote:
>
> Iaen,
>
>  
>
> I know Lyonel supports it.  I hope I didn't insinuate otherwise.  I 
> want everyone here to know that it was he who conducted a poll of the 
> Ansteorran chivalry about 2 years ago with several questions about 
> CA.  I was surprised and very pleased at the outcome.  The Ansteorran 
> Chivalry whole-heartedly support CA...to a person.  Heck, about 1 in 4 
> of us ARE archers!
>
>  
>
> I'm sorry that not more of our chivalry are on the SCA list where this 
> is being discussed.  If the others are like me, they probably can't 
> devote the time to becoming embroiled in yet another e-mail list.  If 
> Lyonel seems to be the only Ansteorran knight or master-at-arms 
> supporting CA on that list, it is only because none of the rest of us 
> participates on it. 
>
>  
>
> If anyone here thinks it would do any good, I would be happy to jump 
> on the list for just a few days, if only to lend what credibility I 
> can to the situation.  But it seems to me that it's really just more 
> complaining than anything else...as usual.
>
>  
>
> Cheers! 
>
>  
>
> Kenneth
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* John [mailto:iaenmor at swbell.net]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:06 PM
> *To:* Archery within the Kingdom of Ansteorra
> *Subject:* Re: [Ansteorra-archery] Newest Attack on CA?
>
>  
>
> Sir Kenneth, as it stands right now I wouldn't worry too much about 
> it.  Quite a bit of gum flapping by some.  Quite a bit of insult 
> flying early on and somewhat still.  Some really good talks about some 
> things.  Those are mostly about crowd safety and netting on the 
> sidelines.  Sir Omarad came on the list and told all we can discuss 
> away but any changes would have to go through the Kingdom marshalletes 
> and up the chain of command.  He made it pretty clear any CA changes 
> asked for would have to go through the SCAM before anything got to him.
>
> Sir Lyonel has actually been fairly supportive of the CA situation.  
> Surprised the hell out of me about that.  He is mainly wondering why 
> we have such ridiculous rules for the archers.  You might want to pop 
> him an email and get his stance for yourself.  I think as far as I can 
> tell he is the only knight from Ansteorra that has spoken up in the 
> discussion.  There have been several others (mostly from the western 
> kingdoms) who have spoken up for CA also.  Most of the dissenters seem 
> to be from the eastern seaboard kingdoms. 
>
> That is my view on what has been happening so far.  Lots of wind and 
> not much else.
>
> Iaen Mor
>
> Ken Theriot wrote:
>
> What information does anyone here have on this?  Sir Lyonel just 
> posted this to the Chiv list.
>
>  
>
> A number of knights in various kingdoms are pressing, lately, to ban 
> fibreglass shaft ammunition and allow only 100# siloflex bolts and 
> arrows on the battlefield.
>
>  
>
> I confess that I don't frequent the SCA-wide lists, so I hadn't heard 
> of this until now.  Does this have a chance?  What is driving this?  
> Lyonel put a pool out to our list to get the opinion of our chivalry 
> on it asking just one question..."do you agree with this?"  I don't 
> expect many of the Ansteorran chivalry to support such an idiotic 
> (sorry...to strong a word?) proposal.  I just wanted to find out what 
> anyone else might know about it.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
>  
>
> Kenneth
>
>  
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra-archery mailing list
> Ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org <mailto:Ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org>
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-archery-ansteorra.org
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra-archery mailing list
> Ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-archery-ansteorra.org
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ansteorra.org/pipermail/ansteorra-archery-ansteorra.org/attachments/20081216/ff5384bd/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the Ansteorra-archery mailing list