[Ansteorra-archery] Gothic questions
Donnchadh Beag mac Griogair
donnchadh at cornelius.norman.ok.us
Sun Sep 13 21:37:03 PDT 2009
I would say that the two factors which make for a good CA scenario are
fairly static lines, and resurrection.
The static lines allow for archers to work behind a defensive shield
wall and not be instantly killed. Archers are all offense and no
defense, so without protection, we're toast.
The resurrection is good for both the archers and our opponents.
Archers are often top targets for cav units, so it's nice not to be out
of the battle early. It also causes much less heartburn from other
fighters if getting shot first thing in the battle just causes them to
have to go back to res point rather than having to go the sidelines
without ever getting a chance to swing a stick.
The best example of this type of scenario is the ravine battle at Gulf Wars.
That's my thoughts.
Eric Brown wrote:
> Okay this begs a couple good questions.
> What are CA Archers favorite scenarios and
> in a rough way, why?
> If you could make up an scenario, JUST to be extra fun for archers,
> what would it be?
> What do you guys think of Boat battles (We have not done them In my
> memory since North sea raids.)
> When I first heard of boat battles I though they were the stupidest
> thing I'd even seen, I even thought about
> boycotting them because I thought they were so stupid (and this was at
> But after doing them I decided they were the best thing ever... and
> they seem like a natural for archery IF you can have enough folks in
> the boat to allow archers to have both hands free.
> What else?
> ansteorra-archery-request at lists.ansteorra.org wrote:
>> Send Ansteorra-archery mailing list submissions to
>> ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> ansteorra-archery-request at lists.ansteorra.org
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> ansteorra-archery-owner at lists.ansteorra.org
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Ansteorra-archery digest..."
>> Today's Topics:
>> 1. Re: Gothic questions. (Eadric Anstapa)
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:00:22 -0500
>> From: Eadric Anstapa <eadric at scabrewer.com>
>> To: Archery within the Kingdom of Ansteorra
>> <ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Ansteorra-archery] Gothic questions.
>> Message-ID: <4AAC5236.4000601 at scabrewer.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> Caladin, I don't think that for a second anyone believes that the
>> format and schedules of the melee events in our kingdom is your
>> responsibility nor is it your fault if they don't work out. It is
>> the responsibility of the branches that sponsor the events, their
>> autocrats, and marshals in charge. But thanks for asking.
>> I hope that Gothic War was a great event for the larger fighting
>> populace. With the tournaments, the Centurion Meet and Beat, etc. it
>> looks as if the larger armored combat community got their fill of
>> fighting. However, for combat archers it is a completely different
>> There are maybe 4 events a year where combat archers really get a
>> chance to do their thing. Thats not a complaint, just a statement.
>> Most fighter practices can't accommodate CA either because they are
>> held on school grounds, in a city, park, or someplace similar where
>> bows an crossbows are simply not allowed or because the location
>> doesn't allow for adequate boundary and buffer zone to keep things
>> safe. Most sites can accommodate small unit practices and drills,
>> but not CA. So, we depend on those few Melee events to give us the
>> combat time that we crave.
>> Gothic war staff habitually doesn't do a good job of setting up their
>> battlefields. Again this year there was no marked boundary on the
>> battlefield. While a clearly marked boundary is not strictly
>> required by the rules, the lack of it sure makes responsible archers
>> nervous. Similarly as noted again this year the bridge for the
>> bridge battles was setup this year in an area that simply could not
>> safely accommodate CA.
>> They started with field battles and of course SCA field battles
>> aren't good for CA because they very seldom stay static long enough
>> for the archers to be really effective and because quite often brute
>> squared are sent to clobber the archers. If an archers gets off 10
>> arrows in a field battle then than has been a exceptional field
>> battle as far as most combat archers are concerned because only
>> getting off 2 or 3 shots in a field battle is more typical. So quite
>> honestly most archers look forward to the end of the field battles
>> and the start of something different where that can me more effective.
>> Since the only battles that took place at the event that could
>> accommodate CA were the field battles, and since the total time spent
>> in those battles that could accommodate CA was maybe 20 minutes the
>> event was a complete waste as far as combat archery was concerned.
>> Before the first field battle even started the marshals were wanting
>> to know where Caladin was and one of them said something like
>> "Someone go roll Caladin out of his tent so we can see what he wants
>> us to do!". If there was a plan to have some good active melee
>> scenarios then I sure didn't see it. It seems as if from the very
>> beginning they were waiting on you to show up and direct training
>> exercises. Of course you did what they expected and the bulk of the
>> time spent out on the field where we could have actually had CA was
>> spent doing training exercises rather than battles, most of it done
>> When they moved over to do the bridge battles the opportunity for
>> CA that day was ended since the location chosen for the bridge battle
>> could not safely accommodate CA. We were told that there would be
>> plenty of CA opportunity for us on Sunday afternoon so we cleaned up
>> and prepared for that. We made sure we were at the melee field at
>> Noon on Sunday so that we would have plenty of time to inspect
>> anything that needed to be inspect and be ready and not miss a second
>> of any CA opportunity. The melees were supposed to start at 2PM so
>> we made sure that we were all in armor and ready to go at 2. Time
>> slipped by, nobody else showed up, then finally around 3:30 they
>> actually sent somebody down to the battlefield to tell us that the
>> Sunday melees had been canceled because the fighter had spent
>> themselves in the tournaments and didn't have energy left for melees.
>> Perhaps the event sponsors had exactly the event they wanted. I am
>> told they purposely threw in all the tournaments and split up the
>> schedule that way so that people would not day trip and so that they
>> would stay until Sunday afternoon for melee opportunity. To do that
>> and then not do everything in your power to assure that those melees
>> happen is quite honestly deception.
>> To say that it was disappointing is an understatement. Giving up a
>> long weekend, driving 7 hours each way and spending $100 in gas to
>> get to an event that was handled like that was frankly infuriating.
>> When on Saturday, before fighting, we voiced some of our concerns
>> with the way that the battlefields were setup to one of the event
>> stewards the response we got was "What do you expect? It's Gothic."
>> Well, What I expect is that Gothic wont be on my event calendar for
>> years to come. This is not the first time that I have been wildly
>> disappointed in Gothic and I far as I can tell the only way that it
>> will be the last time that I am disappointed by Gothic is if I simply
>> skip Gothic. Instead, I'll save the time and money to prepare for
>> and attend melee events that focus on melee experience and where the
>> sponsors are concerned with making sure that it is a good experience.
>> Sorry it took me so long to reply. It's been a really hectic week at
>> work and quite honestly I just didn't want to spend any more time
>> thinking about Gothic and preferred instead to try and look forward
>> to good melees at 3 Queens and BAM.
>> Thanks for your concern.
>> Eric Brown wrote:
>>> I agree that dedicated Melee events for fighting and dedicated war
>>> colleges for training are better.
>>> In fact as a personal note I greatly prefer them that way too.
>>> But as much as I've been bitching about training, when they woke me
>>> up that morning to tell me I was training after the scenarios,
>>> I had to go with it. You can't squash initiative and expect it to
>>> grow, just because it's not happening the way you wanted it to.
>>> Honestly I expected about 10 min of refresher, but we were having
>>> trouble doing refuses, one of the most basic commands, so I tried to
>>> focus on that.
>>> Then I wanted a actual fight to cement the knowledge, and had to
>>> make something up on the fly, when i only had time to teach 1 thing.
>>> (so I snuck in a second command that was easy to teach, to make a
>>> very artificial scenario)
>>> But enough about what we (I) did wrong,I think I had a pretty good
>>> grasp on that up front. Does anyone else have suggestions for
>>> Ansteorra-archery mailing list
>>> Ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org
>> Ansteorra-archery mailing list
>> Ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org
>> End of Ansteorra-archery Digest, Vol 40, Issue 9
> Ansteorra-archery mailing list
> Ansteorra-archery at lists.ansteorra.org
More information about the Ansteorra-archery