<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>Greetings all!
<BR>
<BR>After reading what all of you have so astutely said, I have to say that I
<BR>believe archers, both combat and target, should be recognized as archers
<BR>period. We should not divide ourselves and say "I'm a combat archer and am
<BR>much better than a target archer" or vice-versa. It's just like saying a
<BR>rapier fighter who fights case is much better than a rapier fighter who
<BR>fights with a buckler.
<BR>
<BR>I also believe that there should be an award for archery as well as one for
<BR>equestrian. This is necessary because it encourages people to try out a new
<BR>skill. The rapier community was small until the White Scarves came about. It
<BR>was an encouragement, a "look what you can achieve if you try this" sort of
<BR>thing. Archery needs this.
<BR>
<BR>Our kingdom is sorely lacking in recognition when it comes to archery and
<BR>equestrian events. We need to recognize those who choose to apply themselves
<BR>in these areas because they were necessary in the times we recreate. Archers
<BR>were necessary. Equestrians were necessary. They were recognized for their
<BR>bravery and skill both on the battlefield and during tournaments. Why are we
<BR>not doing this? Are we not recreating the Middle Ages and Renaissance?
<BR>
<BR>The point is is that we need to stop bickering amongst ourselves and unify as
<BR>archers. We are a rare breed in these parts and must stand together to
<BR>achieve recognition.
<BR>
<BR>Agree? Disagree?
<BR>
<BR>Yours,
<BR>Lady Eleanor Cleavely</FONT></HTML>