AD - What to count as dance?
elinthetimid at hotmail.com
Tue Apr 13 16:02:36 PDT 1999
>I would like to second this. I think trying to decide what is
currently considered okay or not is just going to cause a lot of
arguments and take more time than we care to spend on it. Everyone
will have their own opinion as to what is acceptable. However, I do
feel we need to state or at least imply somehow that we should strive
to avoid bringing in any "new" dances (ie ones that are not already
well-known to the SCA) that are known to be OOP or otherwise
inappropriate. Make sense?
>Someone also questioned something to the effect that should we
consider someone who has the required number of dances known - but
they're all ECD - to be equal to someone with the same number of
differing dances - some ECD, some Branles, some Pavans, etc? My
opinion is no. I think we also need to include somewhere something
about having a well-rounded repertoire (sp?). I don't think we need
to get into specifics -so many known of this type, so many >of that -
or anything like that. Just mention that their known dances should be
>from several different "types" of dances. I know that most people
who would currently fit into the higher levels of the heirarchy as is
now stated probably already fall into this situation, but I think it
needs to be actually stated, not simply assumed.
I think you make excellent sense. So can we somehow say that we want
to encourage further work on period dances and recreations, without
discouraging fun OOP things we already do? And asking that magisters
have a well-rounded repertoire leaves that open to interpretation, but
I think it will prevent people from just learning 40 ECDs and nothing
else, without being too particular about numbers.
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Ansteorra-dancers