Proctor [was Re: AD - Bylaws discussions at Steppes Warlord.]

John F. Hirling macfergus at unidial.com
Thu Jun 3 14:43:11 PDT 1999


Russell Kinder (Lord Guillaume) wrote:

>    I fear I left some details out of my minutes. At Steppes, the group
> decided that A.G.E.D. was not so important or critical an organization
> that a bad Proctor couldn't be endured until it was time to elect a new
> one. The consensus was that, in the long run, trying to oust a Proctor
> would cause more divisiveness than it was worth.
>
> --Guillaume
>

If memory serves me correctly, it wasn't that we didn't consider the Guild
important enough or critical enough but simply that there was precious little
damage a poor procter could do that would be important enough or critical enough
to necessitate the divisiveness of ouster.

--
ihon


============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.



More information about the Ansteorra-dancers mailing list