Proctor [was Re: AD - Bylaws discussions at Steppes Warlord.]
John F. Hirling
macfergus at unidial.com
Thu Jun 3 14:43:11 PDT 1999
Russell Kinder (Lord Guillaume) wrote:
> I fear I left some details out of my minutes. At Steppes, the group
> decided that A.G.E.D. was not so important or critical an organization
> that a bad Proctor couldn't be endured until it was time to elect a new
> one. The consensus was that, in the long run, trying to oust a Proctor
> would cause more divisiveness than it was worth.
If memory serves me correctly, it wasn't that we didn't consider the Guild
important enough or critical enough but simply that there was precious little
damage a poor procter could do that would be important enough or critical enough
to necessitate the divisiveness of ouster.
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Ansteorra-dancers