[Ansteorra-marshals] Armored Marshal Test

Tue Jul 19 14:14:14 PDT 2016

we do not.

JP

Qui mieux fait, mieux vault.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Ken Theriot <kentheriot at ravenboymusic.com>
wrote:

> Just took the test and have a question:
>
> The shield question - "A shield alone is considered sufficient elbow armor
> on a side-strapped shield, if the elbow is 4 inches (10.2 cm) or more from
> the edge of the shield during typical use.” I answered “False” and it
> reported I was incorrect? Does Ansteorra not require elbow armor on the
> shield arm any longer?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kenneth
>
> --
> Ken Theriot
> Sent with Airmail
>
> On July 19, 2016 at 12:49:55 PM, Earl Marshal (
> kingdom at marshal.ansteorra.org) wrote:
>
> On the shield question, it doesn't matter if it's strapped or center
> gripped, only that the hand is 4" from the edge.
>
> The padding of camail or aventail was outside of the scope of what I was
> asking about. Perhaps an additional question?
>
> Regarding ABS rigidity, some quick research into material specifications on
> ABS and steel show that in general ABS is 1/7" as strong (yield) as cold
> rolled steel. As such, I don't think that a material 2.5x as thick as the
> minimum steel would be considered rigid as well.
>
> I'm not sure when suprasternal notch was removed.
>
> JP
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Cameron Lewis <cameronlewisok at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > My reply about your reply
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The numbers change on each iteration : my comments about your comments
> > below:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Cameron Lewis <
> cameronlewisok at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > When I took the test it didn't let me choose more than one answer on
> > > question 7
> > >
> > >
> > Which question was that asking about?
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > 7) A shield can be considered back of the hand protection in which of the
> > following circumstances
> >
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > >
> > > Question 13 is true 3/16 bars and when I marked true it said the
> > > answer was false 3/16 bars
> > >
> >
> > You can have 1/8" bars if they are supported every 2 inches.
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Ah I see now I am slow
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Question 17 states "parts of the neck" so that is false...imo ... when
> > > I comes in contact with 3 parts it must be padded but not the other
> > > parts...question is vague
> > >
> > > It's a question direct from society rules:
> >
> > Section VI.D
> > The neck, including the larynx, cervical vertebrae, and first thoracic
> > vertebra must be covered by one or a combination of the following and
> must
> > stay covered during typical combat situations, including turning the
> head,
> > lifting the chin, etc.
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Then how about ?
> > You have to pad a camail or aventail if it comes in contact with the
> front
> > or back of the neck.
> >
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > > I missed question 19 in that I have never seen a single handed weapon
> > > with cutting or smashing heads on both ends ...kinda weird but I
> > > didn't check that one... and the rattan sword without a handguard...i
> > > was thinking that you would wear a gauntlet but then my dinosaur brain
> > > kicked in and there was a rule about SOME kind of hand guard or tsuba
> > > must be on a single handed weapon...
> > >
> > > Looks like I missed 23 also thinking that 1/8 abs was rigid...I am
> > > guessing It is considered resilient then and needs foam behind it?
> > >
> > >
> > Correct.
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Is 3/16 inch abs rigid or resilient?
> > 1/4 inch?
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > > 30 I thought we could have split rattan weapons here? Also the
> > > question might be changed to cutting/slashing weapons instead of two
> > > handed as a fiberglass spear is a two handed weapon and E would not
> > > apply then
> > >
> > >
> > So you are correct about the split rattan, and I've updated it. Mea
> > aculpa.
> > As far as the fiberglass spear.... yes, you are correct, and that was my
> > intent :)
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> > Trixyhobbitses
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> >
> > > 33 missed the Suprasternal notch...i though we had to cover that
> > > too...oops my bad
> > >
> > >
> > > We used to in Ansteorra, which is why I made sure to include it, to
> > > make
> > sure everyone knows that you don't have to.
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Is this new from this version or have I been overarmored for too long?
> > YAY
> >
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I really like the idea?
> > >
> > > Cassius
> > >
> > >
> > > My apologies to all. I included the wrong link.
> > >
> > > Please try this link:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?title=field-and-inspect
> > > ing-ma
> > > rshal-quiz
> > >
> > > Jean Paul
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ansteorra-marshals mailing list
> > Ansteorra-marshals at lists.ansteorra.org
> > http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-marshals-ansteorra.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra-marshals mailing list
> Ansteorra-marshals at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-marshals-ansteorra.org
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra-marshals mailing list
> Ansteorra-marshals at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-marshals-ansteorra.org
>