<div>Even though I have been inactive because of my series of surgeries, I am a cloak fighter and florentine. I have to wait until I'm recovered.</div> <div> </div> <div>My opinion of the whole deal is simple. Why throw your only addition weapon?</div> <div> </div> <div>Don Henri Molineaux</div> <div> </div> <div><BR><B><I>Kevin Wilson <kevwilson@swbell.net></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Dore, please clarify the rule about throwing a cloak at an opponen (and if<BR>this has been changed/clarified in the most recent rule change, ignore<BR>this):<BR><BR>What was stated (I believe as a change in the rules) in the marshal's<BR>meeting at Red Tape was that while a fighter can throw a cloak at an<BR>opponent, the thrown cloak cannot actually hit, strike, or land on the<BR>opponent. But a cloak being wielded in the hand did not have the
same<BR>restriction. I'm not sure of the rule applied to this, I just remember you<BR>stating it and clarifying a question on it. But a number of fighters have<BR>asked for clarification. This has caused a large amount of confusion in<BR>various fights, tournaments, and practices.<BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Corvin<BR>Stargate Rapier Marshal<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Ansteorra-rapier mailing list<BR>Ansteorra-rapier@lists.ansteorra.org<BR>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-rapier-ansteorra.org<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> 
<hr size=1>Need a vacation? <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48256/*http://travel.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFhN2hucjlpBF9TAzk3NDA3NTg5BHBvcwM1BHNlYwNncm91cHMEc2xrA2VtYWlsLW5jbQ--">Get great deals
to amazing places </a>on Yahoo! Travel.