[Bards] Question on performance judging forms

[Melody Soice]

I've got to admit that every time I hear about standardized judging forms I 
keep hoping that they come with the option to disregard them altogether and 
just go with the performer that is the most moving or inspiring.

Melody


>From: "Jay Rudin" <rudin at ev1.net>
>Reply-To: Ansteorran Bardic list <bards at ansteorra.org>
>To: "Ansteorran Bardic list" <bards at ansteorra.org>
>Subject: Re: [Bards] Question on performance judging forms
>Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:46:42 -0500
>
>Let's do it.  I have no particular hore in this race, because I disapprove 
>of all judging forms, but if people have specific issues with a form, we 
>should try to fix it.
>
>Robin of Gilwell / Jay Rudin
>   On 5/8/06, willowjonbardc at juno.com <willowjonbardc at juno.com > wrote:
>     Dear fellow bards
>     As a Laurel I am having problems with the kingdom forms. The Static 
>Arts juding forms do not have a separate documentation section. The 
>documentation falls into the Authentic section. It is support for your 
>piece. I feel it is unfair to add that extra stress to performing artist 
>when it isn't added to static arts. I feel the authentic section is enough 
>and we should drop the extra documentation section.
>     Mistress Willow de Wisp


>_______________________________________________
>Bards mailing list
>Bards at ansteorra.org
>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/bards