[Bards] old way vs new ways charter
Michael Silverhands
silverhands at sbcglobal.net
Mon Oct 30 08:29:34 PST 2006
On Oct 30, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Simone Ui'Dunlaingh wrote:
> I will try.
>
> <snip>
>
> the reason for this structure is to help in th movement of information
> between the bards. to have a storehouse of information for old bards
> and new ones. to have a person for groups to contact should they need
> asistance with a cometition. To promote our craft. to have a resorce
> old and new bards could use. to be in the college was a matter of
> choice not neccesity. the charter alows for our unity as bards of
> ansteorra while allowing us the freedom of our own individual
> autononmy.
>
> The reason i know the charter so well is i was honored with the
> privledge of writing it, and rewriting it until we got something the
> majority could agree on.
>
> simone
>
>> Clearly, I'm missing something. If that's the purpose of the officers
>> of the College... then it seems to me there's no need for it. But,
>> obviously, you and Robin *do* see a clear need... so, equally
>> obviously, you are seeing something that I am not. Can you please
>> clear up this confusion?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
Thank you, Simone and Willow, for taking the time to answer my
question. :-)
Now I'm going to ask another hard question. (I'd rather resolve them
now -- when the asking and answering can strengthen us -- than later
-- when they can undermine what we're trying to do.)
Tell me again why the college failed? (I thought about it, but chose
not to say something gentle like "went dormant". It failed. Let's
just acknowledge that and build from there.) If the charter was
sound, the organization was healthy, and the drive was there from the
people behind it, why did it die? Why is it not, today, a vibrant and
active part of the Kingdom?
(The other side of that question is: given the answer, what can we do
differently this time so we don't go down the same road again?)
I know that an explanation has already been given (paraphrased, "the
Crown wasn't bardic-friendly, and certain Nobles in Fief weren't
bardic-friendly, so we couldn't continue"), but, frankly, I am having
a hard time understanding and accepting that answer. That boils down
to "it wasn't our fault, other people did this to us". Sorry, but --
truly meaning no offense -- that just sounds like denial, and not
taking responsibility. If this group had been healthy, I can't see
how a single bardic-unfriendly Crown (with a reign of 6 months) or a
few bardic-unfriendly Nobles could shut it down. (For that matter, I
was Baron of Stargate from 1995 to 2000. I'd like to think I knew the
other branch nobles fairly well, and I can't name one who was -- to
my knowledge -- unfriendly to bardic. On the contrary, several of
them *were* bards.) So... can someone either please clarify that
explanation, or offer a different one?
Michael
More information about the Bards
mailing list