[Bards] in response to Esther
swcfolksinger at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 31 16:59:49 PST 2006
I can at least speak on Huntsman...
That baby belongs to our Kingdom Archery Marshall who works with the Crown and the Royal huntsman to pull it off.
They archery community is still very small but growing rapidly and they are very good at making certain Royal huntsman is a well attended competition that is challenging and encouraging.
Who would really like to not see two competitions like Huntsman and Eisteddfod against each other again.
Michael Silverhands <silverhands at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Esther wrote:
> Okay. My turn to be blunt.
> I think the Eistefodd needs to be somebody's Baby. On a regular,
> regulated basis -- more than just the Kingdom Bard. I would suggest
> the MoAS Deputy for Bardic be responsbile for the nuts and bolts of
> the even that is Eistefodd, working with the current champion for
> that years format.
> The Event needs to be the responsibility of an office. The FORMAT
> of the COMPETITION would be the responsibilty of the Kingdom Bard,
> as it is now.
> What say y'all?
Today, whose "baby" is Crown? Queen's? Kingdom A&S? Royal Huntsman?
The first two events *will* occur. The Kingdom Seneschal beats the
bushes for bids for these events. Either they or the Crown chooses
from among the bids to decide the hosting group. The Crown decides
the format of the lists. Clearly, those events are the Crown's
"baby", with logistical help from the Kingdom Seneschal.
Maybe there are useful parallels that could be drawn with Kingdom
Bard, but I don't see any. So...
What about Kingdom A&S? Royal Huntsman? Whose "baby" are they? (I
bring them up because I hope there will be aspects of them that will
inform our discussion regarding Kingdom Bard.)
Bards mailing list
Bards at lists.ansteorra.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bards