<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/29/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Robert Fitzmorgan</b> <<a href="mailto:fitzmorgan@gmail.com">fitzmorgan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br>
<div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/29/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Darlene Vandever</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:annescvb@gmail.com" target="_blank">
annescvb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#3333ff" size="4">*Why* isn't it held in the center of the main hall? </font></strong></div></div></blockquote></span>
<div><br> The main hall at Twelfth Night is VERY busy and very loud. I can get louder than most bards, but being that loud tends to strip away a lot of the subtlety from a performance, and doing it for any length of time can be very damaging to the voice, particularly as many of our bards do not have any professional voice training.
</div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4"><strong>One might wonder then how the "period" bards did it. I'm not sure there was "professional voice training" available in the 11th century. Perhaps they did what (I believe) Sean Connary did which was to go down to the sea and try to project over the roaring of the surf. (I may be mixing up my stories but I think I remember reading about some actor who did this.)
</strong></font></div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4">As for "any length of time" damaging the voice, this might then be an arguement *for* a time limit, n'ces pas?</font></strong><span class="q"><br>
</span></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#3333ff" size="4">*Any* competion that lasts 7 or more hours (in my humble opinion) is about 3 to 4 hours to long! </font></strong></div></div></blockquote>
<div><br> You know, I've never really understood why some people think that spending 6 hours in a room listening to the best bards in Ansteorra to be a bad thing. Maybe that's just me. 8^)</div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4">LOL! It is *not* a "bad thing" at all! But when there is so much more going on which is vieing for your attention, then it becomes difficult to maintain yourself (as audience) there for that time period.
</font></strong></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div><br> Suppose that we have 20 people enter this year. That would be a fairly decent turnout. There have been more, and a lot of people here would like there to be more. </div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4">I think we need to ask ourselves if quantity is truely a "good thing". Mundanely I used to coach and judge the science fair at our school. Early on, every child was required to compete. It took a lot of time to look at 400+ entries when really only 10 were worthy of any type of consideration.
</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4">I would rather listen to 10 great bards than sit through 30 less-than-great performances. And I have to agree with Brian that as a person who does bardic, I can learn an enormous lot from those who are better than me by listening and watching them doing what they are great at...bardic. I can also learn what *not* to do by watching those who have disasterous performances...but I really don't want to watch such things for long periods of time.
</font></strong></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<div><span class="q">
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#3333ff" size="4"> There are many ways to make sure that the competition is a speedy one. The simplest is to limit the Bard to 5 minutes or less....and use a time keeper! Every high school drama cometition does this...why can't we?
<br></font></strong></div></span></div></blockquote>
<div><br> I for one don't want Kingdom Eisteddfod to feel like a high school drama competition. I'm sure that's not what you meant but I feel it could be the overall effect. Hustling people on and off the stage as quickly as possible, "got to keep things moving", someone with a watch calling "Time". What could be more mundane?
</div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4">You are right, that isn't what I meant. But we *can* learn a lot from them and I see no reason not to use the various formats such as they have. </font>
</strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4">For example, if you had 6 competent judges, you could split the field of competators into 3 groups with 2 judges each. Run 3 simultaneous preliminary rounds with the judges choosing to send on the top 4 (or 5 depending on how many were in the preliminary round) to the second round. Shuffle the remaining competators into 2 groups and shuffle the judges into 2 groups. Run a secondary round of 2 groups simultaneously with 3 judges. Each group has 2 (or 3) that go onto the final round judged by all 6 judges. The time involved would be considerably lessened.
</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4">And why would someone have to use a watch to be the timekeeper? What is wrong with a good, old-fashioned 3 minute glass? The timekeeper could turn it over twice and there you got a 6 minute round and still have your period ambience.
</font></strong></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div><br> As a storyteller, I get annoyed when I hear judges who want documented performances done in a period style with a 5 minuet time limit. <<<snip>>>. It takes time for a good story to unfold.
<br> I really feel that short time limits penalize storytellers. I'd be interested in hearing what the other storytelles on the list think.</div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><font face="times new roman,serif" color="#009900" size="4">Well, I think I can answer you there since storytelling is about all I do (Aunty Annes! Tell us a story!!) :-)</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4">I think it is really individual preference of the *performer* as to the need for more or less time...I don't think that the audience really cares. The audience is just looking for that surprise ending or that witty turn of phrase. I don't see how storytelling is any different from say ...writing good poetry. Some poems are quite long (ie. Norse Eddas) while others capture the mind and paint a picture with almost no words at all (Japanese Haiku). I don't think that either style is "better" at being a poem than the other. I don't think that stories are necessarily good if they are longer. I think its the *style* that the performer prefers.
</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4">I've sat (and suffered) thru stories that dragged on intermeably to sort of end somewhere...sometime. I, personally, *like* the challenge of trying to tell a good story in a short period of time. I absolutely *revel* in those sorts of challenge competitions where you are given a few words or a phase and told to go off and come back in 20 minutes with a story, poem or song that is 5 minutes or less. I know what you mean about trying to take someone else's story and cutting it down to fit a required time slot but in that case, I would also advise to to pick a story with which you *can* do that. The ones you seem to prefer don't sound like that sort of story.
</font></strong></div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4"></font></strong> </div>
<div><strong><font face="Times New Roman" color="#009900" size="4">Annes</font></strong></div><br> </div>