<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV>Ihon asked the following questions:<BR><BR>> 1. Would you like to
see 'standards' for bards? For example, would it be</DIV>
<DIV>> helpful if anyone who desired to call him or herself a bard would
immediately</DIV>
<DIV>> be considered a beginning bard; a bard who could show a certain
repertoire</DIV>
<DIV>> would be considered an intermediate bard; and a bard who
exhibited an </DIV>
<DIV>> exceptional repertoire would be considered an advanced
bard. <BR><BR>It sounds like such a reasonable idea until you contemplate
what it would actually mean.. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>There is no clear agreement on who the advanced bards are, and there have
often been very wide variations in evaluations of an individual bard's
level. (There was a time when some thought me one of the best in the
kingdom, while others thought me horrible.) We would be promoting some
people's views above others. So who gets to choose?</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Any such set of rankings is either a mutually-agreed, voluntary game,
only for people who choose to be involved, like the old College of Bards had for
its own members alone, or a petty tyranny foisted on at least some of us
unwillingly by a bureaucracy which is trying to rule us, rather than to
support us. Even a purely voluntary internal ranking within a College
causes grief for (and from) outsiders, as that College proved.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Some years ago, there was a group that set out to choose the "100 greatest
novels of all time". They got a group of full-time professionals, with
Ph.D.s in Literary Criticism, who had devoted their lives to analysing these,
the most carefully read works of fiction in the history ofthe world. And
they couldn't agree. We amateurs, working part-time on the weekends in
areas in which we have little formal training will not be able to do better than
they did.<BR><BR>This is a REALLY bad idea.<BR><BR>There are "rankings", if you
want to call them that, implicit in the award system, but it's not primarily a
ranking system, and it is about much more than mere skill. I don't believe
that all Laurels who perform are better than all Irises, or that all Irises are
better than all people with Thistles in performing arts.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In any event, the kingdom bureaucracy has no authority to set up a
competing set of awards, no matter what they're called.<BR><BR>> 2) If you
support the idea of standards, should a certain standard be required to enter
Eisteddfod?<BR><BR>Heck, no. That's what the first round's
for. It's a *competition* -- only the best entrants are going to make it
into the finals anyway. I support every bard who wishes to enter kingdom
Eisteddfod. Fencers can enter Queen's Champion, regardless of fencing
skill. Fighters who meet the requirements to rule the kingdom may enter
Crown, regardless of fighting skill. This competition is for the bards --
all the bards.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Vyolante entered her first Eisteddfod last month (under the name of
Adelina). She had fun, entertained us, and was encouraged in her new
passion of bardcraft. She's entering Queen's Champion this month.
That's the kind of enthusiastic newcomer we need to encourage.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It hasn't been very long since we were trying to encourage more bards to
enter, and concerned because so few would bother. There's no value to
keeping people out.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>> For purposes of this initial discussion, I'd appreciate it if you
respond to this email</DIV>
<DIV>> and not to another's opinion. ...<BR>>
<snip><BR>> Having said all that, of course, you will respond as you
see fit :)<BR></DIV>
<DIV>Sure enough. Read the ones you want to read, but this is an open
forum. I'm sure we'll get some fascinating discussion from responding to
each other's ideas.<BR><BR>Robin of Gilwell / Jay
Rudin</DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>