[Bryn-gwlad] [Ansteorra-announce] [Announcements] President's Report - October 2006 Quarterly Board Meeting

[Sir Lyonel Oliver Grace]

Salut cozyns,

Since the Aveloc R&D, the BOD has been falling back on the item in Corpora 
that says they won't publish any information if the parties in volved so 
desire. Of course, in Aveloc's case he begged them to publish the details 
and they refused, initially claiming they were protecting him. Later they 
claimed they were protecting others involved who did not wish their 
involvement publicized.

Ysabeau mentions the Drik Lancaster case, which is interesting for a couple 
of reasons. First, note the item immediately following the three motions 
against Dirk. Dirk exiled Count Brand, his mundane brother. I don't know all 
the details, but Dirk's request to the BOD to have Count Brand R&Ded (a 
request they threw out) was apparently what launched the investigation that 
ended in Dirk's revocation. Brand claims the BOD upheld his exhile (two 
weeks) in order to appear impartial.

Second, if you compare the three items on Dirk you find that only the 
first--permanent revocation of fighting authorization--is listed as an 
action taken at the behest of the Crown. The BOD revoked Dirk's peerage on 
their own initiative.

lo vostre per vos servir
Meser Lyonel
_________________________________
Dum doceo disco


>From: Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com>
>Reply-To: Barony of Bryn Gwlad <bryn-gwlad at lists.ansteorra.org>
>To: Barony of Bryn Gwlad <bryn-gwlad at lists.ansteorra.org>
>Subject: Re: [Bryn-gwlad] [Ansteorra-announce] [Announcements] President's 
>Report - October 2006 Quarterly Board Meeting
>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:01:26 -0600 (CST)
>
>On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Zach Most <clermont1348 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > but the little gossip in me really wants to know what happened to
> > cause all these banishments and R&Ds.  Does anyone know?
>
>The people who know don't talk, as a rule.  Corpora part X
>(http://sca.org/docs/govdocs.pdf) for Royal Sanctions says "The
>specific cause and occasion of the sanction must be explained in
>writing to the sanctioned individual, but must not be published in the
>kingdom newsletter or otherwise made public."  I'm pretty sure that
>that requirement used to apply to Board sanctions as well, but if so,
>I don't see it in Corpora.  But in any event, they won't talk either.
>
>Daniel de Lincolia
>--
>Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
>_______________________________________________
>Bryn-gwlad mailing list
>Bryn-gwlad at lists.ansteorra.org
>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/bryn-gwlad-ansteorra.org

_________________________________________________________________
Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from 
Microsoft Office Live 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/