[Bryn-gwlad] Board actions

[Chris Zakes]

At 08:18 AM 11/9/2006, you wrote:

> >  The people who know don't talk, as a rule.  Corpora part X
> >(http://sca.org/docs/govdocs.pdf) for Royal Sanctions says "The
> >specific cause and occasion of the sanction must be explained in
> >writing to the sanctioned individual, but must not be published in the
> >kingdom newsletter or otherwise made public."  I'm pretty sure that
> >that requirement used to apply to Board sanctions as well, but if so,
> >I don't see it in Corpora.  But in any event, they won't talk either.
>
>          The Board doesn't do any original action.  The request for
>Revocation and Denial (R&D)  has always come from the Kingdom who banished
>the individual and they generally uphold the decision.  Any particulars are
>discussed in closed executive session and the formal meeting is held
>Saturday.  You do hear bits and rumors from sitting in the meeting but it's
>nothing I would publically say. (grin).  If you use logic and think, you
>could probably figure out some of it.  I will say that this is the first
>time the Board of Directors have removed any peerage from an individual so
>I imagine it was for something that dishonored the ideals espoused by the
>peerages.


I seem to recall from the mists of time (25+ years ago) that Duke 
Aonghais had his peerage revoked (and then reinstated by a friendly 
Crown shortly thereafter.)

         -Tivar Moondragon