ES - for your amusement

[Armand Dragonetti]

Just for fun, (like I don't get enough already), I went back and took the
test again, answering everything wrong, or at least opposite of what I
thought was right. :-)  and recorded my time as 15 minutes. I was expecting
a reasonably high score, to support my theory that it's a "feel-good"
marketing gimmick, but low and behold, I scored 43.
http://www.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/000606/9603059376114

I tend to agree that alot of us scored quite high. However, embarrassingly
low scores are generally not shared as readily. (That's probably why my
squire brother has not shared his score. :-)    Just kidding!!!

-=Armand=-

(Note: I didn't specify WHICH squire brother :-)

From: Todd Marsh <Llywelyn at home.com>


> No we are not a random sample, but I'm surprised that so many of us scored
> in the top 1/2%.  The scores seem a bit inflated.  OTOH, my score of 157
is
> similar to other IQ tests I've taken.
>
> Llywelyn
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Behalf Of Rayburn, Timothy
>
> I'm not sure that it isn't, but I'm also not at all surprised that the
> general populace of the SCA would be a significantly higher than average
IQ
> grouping.  We are far from a statistical cross section of mundane society
at
> large.
>
> Timothy
>
> PS > I scored a 154.
>
>
> > From: Armand Dragonetti [SMTP:dragonetti at generich.com]
> >
> > Well I guess great minds think alike. I scored the same. Are we sure
this
> > is
> > not a gimmick to make you feel good about a good score only to get $9.95
> > out
> > of us for the more in depth test? :-)
> >
> > http://www.iqtest.com/view/iqtest/options/000605/9602215047931
> >
> > -=Armand=-

============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.